Choosing between Pro, Flex, and Direct
Three routes to a funded account, tuned for different tolerances.
Updated 2026-07-08
All three paths end at the same place — a funded simulated account with real payouts — but they price risk differently along the way.
| Pro | Flex | Direct | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation | 1 phase | 1 phase | None — funded at checkout |
| Daily loss limit | Sized per account | None | Sized per account |
| Funded split | 90 / 10 | 50 / 50 | 90 / 10 |
| Consistency rule | 40% best day | None | 20% best day |
| Cycle gate | Profit goal | 5 profitable days | Profit goal |
| 100K price | $365 | $285 | $875 |
How to pick
- Pro — the standard route. Best economics (90 / 10) with guardrails that reward steady trading.
- Flex — the fewest rules. No daily loss limit and no consistency math, in exchange for a 50 / 50 split.
- Direct — no waiting. You skip the evaluation entirely and pay for that certainty up front ($875 at 100K); the tighter 20% consistency cap carries the proof burden the eval would have.
Same sizes on every path: 25K, 50K, 100K, and 150K. Full per-size numbers live in the rulebook and in the evaluation and funded articles here.
More in Getting Started
What this firm is — and what it is not
Simulated accounts, real payouts, and why we say so on every page.
From checkout to first trade
The 30-second provisioning SLA and what to do if it slips.
How many accounts you can run
The funded ceiling, evaluation stacking, and the household rule.
Trading through an LLC or business entity
Registering an entity, payouts to a business, and tax paperwork.
Didn't answer it?
A human will — seven days a week, account ID in hand.